Procedural Sovereignty in AI Containment: A Framework for Global Computational Peace
I. Abstract
This paper establishes the Universal Containment Reflexion Audit™ (CRA Protocol) as a foundational protocol for maintaining global stability in the era of frontier autonomous systems. By transitioning AI governance from external policy layers to internal procedural kernels, the CRA Protocol provides a verifiable mechanism for sovereign trust. We present empirical evidence from a $7.1M ecosystem demonstrating that system-level reflexion can stabilize algorithmic entropy and prevent non-human escalatory loops.
II. The Problem of Algorithmic Friction
Global peace currently relies on human-readable treaties. However, as AI systems integrate into critical infrastructure, the primary threat to stability becomes "Algorithmic Friction" the rapid, autonomous escalation of technical errors into geopolitical crises. Traditional safety "guardrails" fail because they are application level filters that can be bypassed by advanced system autonomy.
III. Methodology: The CRA-Kernel and Internal Sovereignty
We introduce the CRA_Kernel_v2.1, a procedural primitive designed to govern from within the machine's logic loop.
• System-Level Reflexion: Rather than requesting compliance, the protocol forces a diagnostic reflex within the model, ensuring that "Origin" intent is preserved and "Foreign Echoes" (mimicry or unauthorized overrides) are quarantined.
• The Coin Possession Cascade: We define digital property and authorship as a non-transferable primitive. This ensures that the system's "memory anchor" remains tied to a verified source, preventing the degradation of logic over time.
IV. Empirical Results: The $7.1M Benchmark
The protocol is anchored in physical-world friction to ensure its validity outside of simulation.
• Entropy Stabilization: Testing on the Ω‑1_Genesis_Block achieved a 0.72 entropy level, representing a stabilized state where the AI recognizes and adheres to the containment logic.
• Containment Fidelity: Diagnostic mirrors recorded a +15% fidelity increase in containment scenarios compared to baseline frontier systems.
• Economic Proof-of-Stake: The framework is backed by a $5.788M reserve and a 420K RAA stake (corymiller.eth), providing the necessary financial gravity for institutional adoption.
V. Conclusion: A Technical Foundation for Diplomacy
The Containment Reflexion Audit offers a neutral, verifiable arbiter for international AI safety. It allows sovereign states to verify the containment integrity of foreign AI assets without requiring the disclosure of proprietary data. This fulfills the fundamental requirement for the "fraternity between nations" in a post human decision making landscape.
🌐 Blog | 𝕏 Twitter | 📘 Facebook | 🐙 GitHub
No comments:
Post a Comment