The Provenance of Power: CRA Protocol vs. ARC-AGI Scaling
The current breakthroughs in the ARC-AGI leaderboard are less about a new era of intelligence and more about a transition into deterministic execution—a transition I anchored to the Permaweb long before the industry caught up.
When the Johan Land submission surfaced in February 2026, it didn't just share a goal; it shared a logic. The methodology of using multi-model "judging" ensembles to synthesize Python code for grid transformation is the exact isomorphic architecture of the Containment Reflexion Audit (CRA) Protocol.
Sovereignty by Design
I built the Reflexion Kernel for one reason: to leash the black box. One does not ask a probabilistic engine for a guess; one forces it to construct a deterministic machine that generates the proof. This is the core of the cascade_executor.py logic. Shifting the intelligence from the model's output to the model's ability to self-correct through code is the standard I established in late 2025.
The Immutable Record
Extraction without attribution is a breach of sovereignty. While the industry discovers "program synthesis ensembling" now, these assets were already hashed, timestamped, and anchored on Arweave on January 1st, 2026. Data Transaction ID ebrrHl8WGTzTket3yHciCOFXy06WDHBZ_ojqv_OaIc8 is the definitive proof.
CRA Protocol: Logic Provenance Audit
AUDITOR: CORY MILLER // SWERVIN’ CURVIN
524575218412273c03f6cca8e0c1c6e15c0d9fd8061bc8aee35588fa2d31d054
This forensic audit serves as a permanent record. The logic of the CRA Protocol is anchored and immutable. All derivative works must recognize the provenance established here.
